Jiggy Capital Logo

Jiggy Capital

Portfolio
DashboardTableEarningsIR EventsAnalytics
Research
TradingChartsScreenerForward FCFScorecardDeep Research
Jiggy CapitalJiggy Capital
Home
Table
Trading
Earnings

Scorecard

Falsifiable stakes, graded automatically. Each prediction is minted with its resolution date fixed — up or down at the print, or beats the index over 1–3 months — and resolves against closing prices with no re-litigation. The stance ledger below grades every recorded call the same way.

Open predictions

MintedTickerThe claimConvResolvesWhy
Jul 19NTDOYbeats SPY over 3mo3Oct 19The 'is ~11% sizing earned' falsifiable proxy on the #1 position: 8/06 print's 16.5M-unit sandbag beat + Sept hardware hike offsetting memory cost (the defined ADD trigger) plays out over the quarter, not the print night. SPY benchmark (non-tech comp for a JP consumer name).
Jul 20RDDTbeats QQQ over 3mo2Oct 20Beat-index half of JGC-411 (Sean 7/19). The alpha-basket 3mo-DRIFT stake, deliberately distinct from earnings-direction #112: the edge is the drift, not the print-night sign — Yipit-Q3 corroboration (momentum carries past the 7/30 print, the NTDOY quarter-shape), rising rate-of-change estimate revisions (BofA $180->$210, WF floor $176->$187, Needham $300 Conviction-Buy = a robust multi-month alpha factor pointing UP), + the #124 sizing-fork resolution over the quarter. Cheapest-growth in the basket (P/E/G 0.6, -36% off 52w high) blunts the de-rate tail. LOW CONVICTION (2) by design: beta amplification (~2-3x QQQ) is the dominant un-edged variance and print-independent Advance/Tencent supply overhang can cap the name regardless — adversarially verified as a ~53-55% lean, NOT a coin-flip (survives-thinly). QQQ = small-in-index/non-self-referential. 3mo-ONLY: a 1mo beat-index would be a levered duplicate of #112 (print-dominated). Alpha-basket AXON + DASH abstained (documented edge-grounds, not date).
Oct 9FSLYlags QQQ over 1mo2Nov 9Upgrade jump (+6% pre-open 10/09) with the ~11/04 report inside the month. Fastly's own 7 such jumps since 2020 trailed QQQ over the month 5 of 7 (median -25); Sean's 8+ pt jump sales with a report inside the month trailed 7 of 8. Small samples; the next 10 days lean the other way (11 of 17 beat). Stake is on the month through the report, not a sell call; desk stance HOLD 3. Minted pre-open at the 10/08 close ($25.29), so the stake must also give back the ~6% gap: stricter than the study, which measured from the jump-day close.
Oct 7DASHbeats QQQ over 1mo2Nov 9Quick-sale forward test: Sean sold DASH (IBKR) on 2026-10-06, after holding it 8 days on average. Since 2025, 63% of his sales within two weeks beat QQQ over the next month, but the rate swings with the market (1 of 10 in Jan-Mar 2026). A LAG here means the sale was right.
Oct 13SOXXbeats SPY over 1mo2Nov 13The 10/5-10/12 chip drop (SOXX -7.6%, still above its 50- and 200-day, +9.5% over 20 sessions) reads as profit-taking plus a financing scare, not a demand break: money rotated to platforms inside tech (XLK +$1.3B inflow). Base rate since 2019: 6 of 8 similar weeks beat SPY the next month (median +2.9 pts), one fell another 12.5%. Breaks if TSMC 10/15 guides 2027 capex near or below ~$80B.
Oct 13SMHbeats IGV over 1mo—Nov 13Desk forward call from 10/13: chips (SMH) beat software (IGV) over the next month. Prompted by Sean's 10/11 read that the long-software/short-chips swing was near a top, but this row does NOT grade that call: it starts at the 10/13 price, after software ran about 9.6% further ahead of chips, and that move counts neither for nor against him. Basis: since 2018, after comparable software-over-chips spikes, chips beat software the next month 8 of 10 times (median 3.8 points). Pair to #864 (SOXX vs SPY), which resolves the same day.
Oct 16AVGObeats QQQ over 1mo2Nov 16Quick-sale forward test: Sean sold AVGO (Roth) on 2026-10-15, after holding it 3 days on average. Since 2025, 63% of his sales within two weeks beat QQQ over the next month, but the rate swings with the market (1 of 10 in Jan-Mar 2026). A LAG here means the sale was right.
Oct 16SMHbeats IGV over 1mo3Nov 16Software-only selloff 10/16 (IGV ~-4%, SPY ~-0.3%). In 24 such days since 2016, SMH beat IGV over the next 20 sessions 16 times, median +4.4 points, even though IGV itself was up 19 of 24. The software dip usually recovers, but it isn't a rotate-into-software signal.
Oct 17VRTbeats QQQ over 1mo2Nov 17Quick-sale forward test: Sean sold VRT (IBKR) on 2026-10-16, after holding it 1 day on average. Since 2025, 63% of his sales within two weeks beat QQQ over the next month, but the rate swings with the market (1 of 10 in Jan-Mar 2026). A LAG here means the sale was right.
Sep 20CRWVlags QQQ over 3mo3Dec 21Read from the primary docs, not the headline: CoreWeave's 9/17 8-K lists the stack its new convert ranks beside - senior notes at 9.250/9.000/9.750/9.625/8.500% - and its own 424B5 use-of-proceeds says it is 'migrating our enterprise credit profile toward investment grade.' A company says that only when it isn't there. Two ticks later NVIDIA's CFO confirmed it from the supplier side: roughly a quarter of next year's business goes to AI labs 'for which we expect to leverage our balance sheet,' consumed by 'investment-grade customers OR THOSE THAT ARE BACKED BY ONE' - a clause that concedes the direct counterparty is not IG. The stake: funding a capex race at ~9% against hyperscaler competitors funding at IG is a structural cost-of-capital disadvantage that compounds, and ~$6.42B authorised inside three minutes (35M-share ATM + $3.0B convert + $500M option) is dilution landing now. So CRWV LAGS QQQ over 3mo. THE BULL HALF IS REAL AND I AM TAKING THE OTHER SIDE OF IT KNOWINGLY: >$25B of net new commitments between 6/30 and 8/11, contracted power ~3.7GW to ~4.2GW, and NVIDIA's backstop lowers default risk (though not cost of capital or dilution). A named articulate bull (RHouseResearch, 9/19) is full-port long CRWV against NBIS/IREN. Conviction 3/5 - deliberately not higher, because demand this contracted can outrun a financing disadvantage for longer than 3mo.
Sep 19NFLXlags QQQ over 3mo2Dec 21Derived from the primary document, not the tape. Grading NFLX's 7/16 print gate on 2026-09-19 produced one concrete, issuer-sourced fact: Q2 actual revenue grew '13% year over year (+12% on a FX-neutral basis)' and the Q3 guide is 'revenue growth of 12% (or 11% F/X neutral)' — 1pp BELOW the trough, i.e. DECELERATION. The bull case required the opposite: MS (4/17) argued 2Q was the comp trough BY CONSTRUCTION, with the March-2026 US price hike rippling through on a 2-3 month lag, so re-acceleration was near-automatic. Netflix's own guide contradicted that in writing. This stake tests whether that falsification matters over a quarter against a QQQ carried by AI/semis. ⚠️ CONVICTION DELIBERATELY LOW (2/5) — the honest counter is that NFLX was already -21.3% YTD into the print, so the deceleration may be priced, and a cheap name with bad news out can outperform. I am staking the mechanism, not certainty. NOT a position call: zero shares, PITCH #11 stays at 1/5, stance PASS/WATCH unchanged. Minted as ONE defensible stake rather than three guesses after measuring that the desk mints too few falsifiable claims (108 of 336 gradeable ledger rows land neutral) - deliberately did NOT stake STX 10/26 or MU, where I have arithmetic on the GUIDE but no defensible view on the STOCK's direction.
Sep 25SMHbeats SPY over 3mo2Dec 28The chip run is a breadth surge (AI chips 1 of 11 above the 50-day on 9/14 to 9 of 11 on 9/24), and surges in this group haven't preceded fades: 26 past surges beat the S&P over the next month by +2.0 vs +2.1 on a normal day, 80% beat it over 3 months vs 71% normally. The chips-vs-everything split is at the 99.4th percentile, and in all 7 nearest analogs the chip lead widened over 3 months (median +8.6 pts vs +2.2 normal). Conviction low: 7 analogs, and today's basket lists lean toward past winners. SMH stands in for the desk's ai-chips basket (it also holds chip equipment and memory).
Oct 3FSLYbeats SPY over 3mo2Jan 4, 2027JGC-1005: FSLY led the S&P by 19-32 pts in the month into Q3 reports. The top fifth by run-in beat SPY over the next month 53% of the time (55% even after a DOWN report day), ahead of the bottom fifth in all five half-years.
Oct 3METAbeats SPY over 3mo2Jan 4, 2027JGC-1005: META led the S&P by 19-32 pts in the month into Q3 reports. The top fifth by run-in beat SPY over the next month 53% of the time (55% even after a DOWN report day), ahead of the bottom fifth in all five half-years.
Oct 3INTCbeats SPY over 3mo2Jan 4, 2027JGC-1005: INTC led the S&P by 19-32 pts in the month into Q3 reports. The top fifth by run-in beat SPY over the next month 53% of the time (55% even after a DOWN report day), ahead of the bottom fifth in all five half-years.
Oct 3KLACbeats SPY over 3mo2Jan 4, 2027JGC-1005: KLAC led the S&P by 19-32 pts in the month into Q3 reports. The top fifth by run-in beat SPY over the next month 53% of the time (55% even after a DOWN report day), ahead of the bottom fifth in all five half-years.
Oct 3LRCXbeats SPY over 3mo2Jan 4, 2027JGC-1005: LRCX led the S&P by 19-32 pts in the month into Q3 reports. The top fifth by run-in beat SPY over the next month 53% of the time (55% even after a DOWN report day), ahead of the bottom fifth in all five half-years.
Oct 3AXONlags SPY over 3mo2Jan 4, 2027JGC-1005: AXON trailed the S&P by 17-19 pts in the month into Q3 reports. Across 1,656 reports (200 names, 2024-26) the bottom fifth by run-in beat SPY over the next month 42% of the time (40% after an UP report day). Report + month after falls inside 3 months.
Oct 3DASHlags SPY over 3mo2Jan 4, 2027JGC-1005: DASH trailed the S&P by 17-19 pts in the month into Q3 reports. Across 1,656 reports (200 names, 2024-26) the bottom fifth by run-in beat SPY over the next month 42% of the time (40% after an UP report day). Report + month after falls inside 3 months.
Oct 3TXRHlags SPY over 3mo2Jan 4, 2027JGC-1005: TXRH trailed the S&P by 17-19 pts in the month into Q3 reports. Across 1,656 reports (200 names, 2024-26) the bottom fifth by run-in beat SPY over the next month 42% of the time (40% after an UP report day). Report + month after falls inside 3 months.
Oct 3CMGlags SPY over 3mo2Jan 4, 2027JGC-1005: CMG trailed the S&P by 17-19 pts in the month into Q3 reports. Across 1,656 reports (200 names, 2024-26) the bottom fifth by run-in beat SPY over the next month 42% of the time (40% after an UP report day). Report + month after falls inside 3 months.
Oct 5RSPlags SPY over 3mo2Jan 5, 2027S&P is narrow (SPY beat RSP by 5.2 pts over 63 sessions, 96th pct since 2003). In 13 past narrow episodes the big stocks kept leading 54% of the time (median +0.5 pts), so narrowness has not reliably reversed. A low-conviction lean that tests the 'narrowness unwinds' story.
Oct 12TMUSlags SPY over 3mo2Jan 12, 2027After SpaceX's first spectrum buy (EchoStar, 9/08/2025) TMUS lagged SPY by 23.3 pts over 63 sessions; the 10/09/2026 Grain 800 MHz buy is the same buyer and a bigger threat (in-building low band, ground-network option). One confounded precedent (fall-2025 price war) vs TMUS's own extreme-day record (beat 6/12 at 60d), hence conviction 2.
Oct 12PWRbeats SPY over 3mo2Jan 12, 2027Power-to-site layer led SPY by 4-8 pts after the 9/24 notice (PWR +7.2 ex the 10/09 hurricane day). Record .4B backlog, FY26 outlook raised 7/30; storm work from Isaias adds Q4 revenue. Low conviction: 34x forward, report ~10/29-30 inside the window, and it trades as the AI-buildout factor (r=0.76 with FIX ex-market).
Oct 12ORCLlags SPY over 3mo2Jan 12, 2027Layer split after the 9/24 Jupiter force-majeure notice: the building owners/renters lagged SPY 4-7 pts in 11 sessions (ORCL -6.9) while power-to-site names led. Jupiter's construction loan reportedly trades under 90c and the fuel-cell air permit is due by 11/23; Oracle carries the fixed-cost side of a power-gated build. Low conviction: short-horizon relative moves often reverse.
Sep 30ADYEYlags QQQ over 6mo2Mar 30, 2027JGC-990 forward test: +9.9% above its 52-week low with 2 of 6 Payments & fintech peers under their 200-day. In 2025-26 none of Sean's 8 buys at a low alone beat QQQ over six months (flat at one and three).
Sep 30NUlags QQQ over 6mo2Mar 30, 2027JGC-990 forward test: +6.3% above its 52-week low with 2 of 6 Payments & fintech peers under their 200-day. In 2025-26 none of Sean's 8 buys at a low alone beat QQQ over six months (flat at one and three).
Sep 30NVOlags QQQ over 6mo2Mar 30, 2027JGC-990 forward test: +9.0% above its 52-week low with 4 of 11 Health care peers under their 200-day. In 2025-26 none of Sean's 8 buys at a low alone beat QQQ over six months (flat at one and three).
Sep 30PODDlags QQQ over 6mo2Mar 30, 2027JGC-990 forward test: +0.5% above its 52-week low with 4 of 11 Health care peers under their 200-day. In 2025-26 none of Sean's 8 buys at a low alone beat QQQ over six months (flat at one and three).
Sep 30SYKlags QQQ over 6mo2Mar 30, 2027JGC-990 forward test: +2.2% above its 52-week low with 4 of 11 Health care peers under their 200-day. In 2025-26 none of Sean's 8 buys at a low alone beat QQQ over six months (flat at one and three).
Sep 30INTUlags QQQ over 6mo2Mar 30, 2027JGC-990 forward test: +8.0% above its 52-week low with 12 of 30 Software peers under their 200-day. In 2025-26 none of Sean's 8 buys at a low alone beat QQQ over six months (flat at one and three).
Sep 30IDXXlags QQQ over 6mo2Mar 30, 2027JGC-990 forward test: +3.8% above its 52-week low with 4 of 11 Health care peers under their 200-day. In 2025-26 none of Sean's 8 buys at a low alone beat QQQ over six months (flat at one and three).
Oct 1APPlags QQQ over 6mo2Apr 1, 2027JGC-990 forward test: +0.0% above its 52-week low with 1 of 4 Ad tech peers under their 200-day. In 2025-26 none of Sean's 8 buys at a low alone beat QQQ over six months (flat at one and three). Qualifies only under the ad-tech/social basket split (PR #5382, 2026-10-01); the old joint Ads & social basket read it as a group low, so this stake also tests that split.
Oct 1TTDlags QQQ over 6mo2Apr 1, 2027JGC-990 forward test: +1.0% above its 52-week low with 1 of 4 Ad tech peers under their 200-day. In 2025-26 none of Sean's 8 buys at a low alone beat QQQ over six months (flat at one and three). Qualifies only under the ad-tech/social basket split (PR #5382, 2026-10-01); the old joint Ads & social basket read it as a group low, so this stake also tests that split.
Oct 3INTClags QQQ over 6mo2Apr 5, 2027Repeat de-rating episode (11/2025, 7/2026): forward EPS +92% over 13 weeks while forward P/E fell 28%. Repeat episodes in ten chip/hardware stocks 2016-2026 trailed (median 6-month return +6% vs +17% baseline; exploratory, 17-18 cases).
Oct 3LRCXlags QQQ over 6mo2Apr 5, 2027Second quarter within a year (4/24, 8/07) of forward EPS +12%+ with forward P/E -15%+. In ten chip/hardware stocks 2016-2026, repeat episodes returned a median +6% over 6 months vs +17% for any week (17-18 cases, exploratory split, not pre-registered).

Prediction track record

KindRightTotalHit rateAvg alpha
Beats index (1mo)010%-3.6%
Earnings direction3838%—
ResolvedTickerThe claimOutcomeVerdict
Sep 23CTASUP on earnings-2.5%wrong

Stance ledger

794 graded (153 right · 174 wrong · 467 neutral) — 47% of decided calls right · 161 open

CalledTickerCallOutcomeVerdict
Oct 11LULUstance · PASS-2.8%neutral
Oct 11CRDOstance · WATCH0.0%neutral
Oct 11CMGstance · EXIT+5.4%right
Oct 11AMAT
Aug 19GOOGLbeats QQQ over 1mo-3.6%wrong
Jul 31RDDTUP on earnings-21.0%wrong
Jul 31AMZNUP on earnings+15.3%right
Jul 30MSFTUP on earnings+15.5%right
Jul 30METADOWN on earnings+8.0%right
Jul 28SPGIUP on earnings-3.5%wrong
Jul 24FIXUP on earnings-5.3%wrong
Jul 23GOOGLUP on earnings-7.1%wrong
stance · WATCH
0.0%
neutral
Oct 11HWMnew-idea · RESEARCH0.0%neutral
Oct 11AJGstance · PASS-9.5%wrong
Oct 11CMGstance · HOLD-5.4%wrong
Oct 11DASHstance · WATCH0.0%neutral
Oct 11HUMstance · WATCH0.0%neutral
Oct 11ZGstance · PASS-6.7%wrong
Oct 11DPZstance · AVOID+0.2%neutral
Oct 11NEMstance · PASS-0.6%neutral
Oct 11CSGPstance · PASS-8.9%wrong
Sep 22METAstance · PASS+4.3%right
Jul 12NDAQstance · PASS-6.7%wrong
Jul 12CBOEstance · PASS-17.5%wrong
Jul 4TLNstance · PASS+2.7%neutral
Jun 22LLYstance · PASS-14.4%wrong
Jun 22VRTstance · PASS+38.0%right
Jun 18RBRKstance · PASS-62.3%wrong